Respond to the class discussion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Respond to the class discussion - Essay ExampleInstead, he will expose his cause family and himself to tensions that will destroy harmony. Even his own relations with his friend would lot an unpleasant turn once his family would be suffering. He may, at a later point in time, regret having helped his friend and curse him for his failure, while the friend may not even feel rubber for him Therefore, Kants theory would recommend complying with the firstborn formulation rather than the trine. Response to class fellows on first discussion Marta I agree to you in your analysis of the first formulation of Kant not for the reason you hold back provided but because that was the demand of the first formulation. You progress to given the matter an altogether different dimension of spot that I think is not quite relevant here. You piddle say that father should not consist because lying is wrong, and not because he has an obligation towards his family. That would be completely wrong an d inconsiderate of father if he chooses not to lie because lying is bad. ... Cshena You are right in your analysis of the first formulation of Kant. I too believe that father should resolve to save his career and his familys future instead of manner of speaking his friend. It is the requirement of the first formulation of Kant. If father helps his friend, he will still gain blame of his own wife and seven children, so the job is plainly not perfect. Also, father will earn the cheers of his friend for having saved his life. This renders his act imperfect in light of the first formulation of Kant. I too consent with you in your interpretation of Kants third formulation because it fundamentally requires father to fulfill his concern towards the society irrespective of his personal concerns. Henke You have come up with a general response to the caput and have not clearly analyzed the case separately in light of the first and third formulations of Kant. However, I do consent with y ou when you say that father should be protective towards his own family. He has got a wife and seven children to take care of and for whom, he is the sole bread earner. I also standardized the way you have analyzed the matter in a broader background that involves all people of society. You said that it would be wrong for father to lie because this would encourage everybody to lie and that would be wrong. However, I think you could have looked at it differently You could have said, What if every family in the society hid a Jewish family? That would obviously have raised governments suspicion for its own people, and ultimately, life of not only the Jews but also of non-Jews would be on stake. Response to class fellows on the second discussion Parker I